The U.S. Withdrawal from UNESCO: A Closer Look
In a significant move that has stirred international debate, the United States has announced its decision to withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). This decision, set to take effect in December 2026, has been framed by U.S. officials as a response to what they describe as UNESCO’s "woke, divisive cultural and social causes."
The Context of Withdrawal
This latest action is part of a broader trend observed during the Trump administration, which has sought to distance the U.S. from various international organizations. Prior to this, the U.S. had exited the World Health Organization and the Paris Climate Agreement, while also cutting funding for foreign relief efforts. The withdrawal from UNESCO is seen as a continuation of the "America First" foreign policy, which prioritizes national interests over global cooperation.
UNESCO’s Response
Audrey Azoulay, UNESCO’s Director General, expressed her disappointment at the U.S. decision, labeling it "regrettable" but also "anticipated." Azoulay emphasized that the agency has been preparing for such a move by diversifying its funding sources, as the U.S. currently contributes about 8% of UNESCO’s budget. This proactive approach aims to mitigate the impact of the U.S. withdrawal on various programs and initiatives.
The Controversial Issues
A significant point of contention in the U.S. withdrawal is the inclusion of the Palestinians in UNESCO, which occurred in 2011. The U.S. State Department has described this inclusion as "highly problematic," arguing that it contradicts U.S. policy and fosters anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization. However, Azoulay countered these claims, highlighting UNESCO’s commitment to Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism, which she argues contradicts the narrative presented by U.S. officials.
The Impact on Multilateralism
Azoulay further noted that the U.S. exit from UNESCO undermines the principles of multilateralism, which are essential for addressing global challenges. She pointed out that many communities in the U.S. benefit from UNESCO’s initiatives, including those seeking recognition for World Heritage sites and Creative City status. The withdrawal could hinder these local efforts, affecting cultural and educational projects across the nation.
Historical Precedents
This is not the first time the U.S. has distanced itself from UNESCO. In 2017, during Trump’s first term, the U.S. withdrew from the organization, a decision that was later reversed under President Joe Biden. The history of U.S. funding to UNESCO has been tumultuous; in 2011, the Obama administration halted $60 million in funds after UNESCO granted full membership to the Palestinian Authority, citing U.S. law that prohibits funding to organizations that recognize Palestinian statehood.
UNESCO’s Mission and Global Role
Founded in November 1945, shortly after World War II, UNESCO was established to promote peace and security through international cooperation in education, the arts, sciences, and culture. The agency is best known for its World Heritage List, which recognizes sites of cultural and natural significance around the globe. With 194 member states, UNESCO plays a crucial role in fostering dialogue and understanding among diverse cultures.
Looking Ahead
As the U.S. prepares for its withdrawal, the implications for both UNESCO and the broader international community remain to be seen. The agency’s efforts to adapt and diversify funding sources may help sustain its initiatives, but the absence of U.S. participation will undoubtedly reshape the dynamics of global cultural and educational cooperation. The ongoing discourse surrounding this decision highlights the complexities of international relations and the challenges of balancing national interests with global responsibilities.
